Perancangan Model Penerimaan Bahan Baku Terintegrasi FSC-COC Dan IWAy 6.0 Menggunakan Metode FMEA Dan AHP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55826/jtmit.v5i4.2226Keywords:
FSC-COC, IWAY 6.0, FMEA, AHPAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan merancang model penerimaan bahan baku yang mengintegrasikan persyaratan Forest Stewardship Council–Chain of Custody (FSC-CoC) dan IWAY 6.0 pada PT XYZ. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif dengan studi kasus. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi terhadap proses penerimaan bahan baku, dokumen pendukung, penerapan persyaratan FSC-CoC dan IWAY 6.0, serta potensi risiko. Identifikasi risiko dilakukan pada tahapan kedatangan kendaraan, verifikasi dokumen, identifikasi material, pemeriksaan kualitas, unloading, dan penyimpanan. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) digunakan untuk menilai risiko berdasarkan Severity, Occurrence, dan Detection. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) digunakan sebagai kerangka penentuan prioritas aspek pengendalian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses penerimaan telah mencakup pemeriksaan kualitas, dokumen, pemasok, FSC-CoC, IWAY 6.0, dan traceability, tetapi masih terdapat potensi kesenjangan antara prosedur dan praktik ketika verifikasi dipercepat untuk menghindari antrean. Risiko yang teridentifikasi meliputi ketidaksesuaian klaim FSC, ketidakpatuhan K3 transporter, kesalahan label, ketidaksesuaian spesifikasi material, pencampuran FSC dan non-FSC, serta ketidaksesuaian informasi pemasok. Model yang diusulkan mengintegrasikan Gate-In Check, verifikasi dokumen, identifikasi material, pemeriksaan kualitas, verifikasi FSC-CoC, Unloading Check, traceability, dan final sign-off. Data penelitian yang tersedia belum memuat matriks perbandingan berpasangan dan Consistency Ratio AHP, sehingga bobot AHP numerik tidak disajikan.
References
[1] P. Aurenhammer, J. Palm, and M. Lindahl, “Forest Chain of Custody Certification as a Tool for Sustainable Supply Chain Management,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 256, p. 120447, 2020.
[2] P. Beske and S. Seuring, “Putting Sustainability into Supply Chain Management,” Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 322–331, 2014.
[3] P. Patil, T. Tan, S. Rispens, S. Dabadghao, and E. Demerouti, “Supplier sustainability: a comprehensive review and future research directions,” Sustain. Manuf. Serv. Econ., vol. 1, p. 100003, 2022.
[4] E. M. da Silva, M. O. Ramos, A. Alexander, and C. J. C. Jabbour, “A systematic review of empirical and normative decision analysis of sustainability-related supplier risk management,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 244, p. 118808, 2020.
[5] F. S. Council, “FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1: Chain of Custody Certification,” Forest Stewardship Council, 2021.
[6] IKEA, “IWAY – The IKEA Supplier Code of Conduct,” IKEA Global, 2026.
[7] D. H. Stamatis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution, 2nd ed. ASQ Quality Press, 2003.
[8] Z. Liu, “Risk Evaluation Approach Based on FMEA,” 2013.
[9] K. Dhalmahapatra, A. Garg, K. Singh, N. F. Xavier, and J. Maiti, “An integrated RFUCOM–RTOPSIS approach for failure modes and effects analysis: A case of manufacturing industry,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 222, p. 108333, 2022.
[10] T. L. Saaty, “Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008.
[11] O. S. Vaidya and S. Kumar, “Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2006.
[12] P. A. Alvarez, A. Ishizaka, and L. Martínez, “Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 183, p. 115368, 2021.
[13] E. Siems, S. Seuring, and L. Schilling, “Stakeholder roles in sustainable supply chain management: a literature review,” J. Bus. Econ., vol. 93, pp. 747–775, 2023.
[14] “Green and low carbon matters: A systematic review of the past, today, and future on sustainability supply chain management practices among manufacturing industry,” Clean. Logist. Supply Chain, vol. 4, p. 100144, 2021.
[15] M. J. Hermoso-Orzáez and J. Garzón-Moreno, “Risk management methodology in the supply chain: a case study applied,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 313, pp. 1051–1075, 2022.
[16] S. A. Hazaea, “Sustainability assurance practices: a systematic review and future research agenda,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, pp. 4843–4864, 2022.
[17] A. ur Rehman, M. S. S. Jajja, and S. Farooq, “Manufacturing planning and control driven supply chain risk management: a dynamic capability perspective,” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., vol. 167, p. 102933, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andri Purnama, Heru Darmawan, Rani Rahmadiyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
