Evaluasi Intensitas Kontribusi Komponen Teknologi pada Kawasan Sains dan Teknologi Menggunakan Ordinal Priority Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55826/jtmit.v5i3.2140Keywords:
Kawasan Sains Teknologi, Kapabilitas Internal, Teknometrik, Ordinal Priority Approach, Pembobotan Prioritas, HumanwareAbstract
Kawasan Sains Teknologi (KST) atau Science and Technology Park (STP) di Indonesia menghadapi tantangan keterbatasan sumber daya, sehingga memerlukan strategi prioritisasi kapabilitas internal yang tepat sasaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dan menetapkan urutan prioritas pengembangan komponen-komponen kapabilitas internal KST berdasarkan pendekatan teknometrik. Kerangka kerja Technology Component System Framework (TCSF) digunakan untuk mengklasifikasikan sistem teknologi KST ke dalam lima komponen (Technoware, Humanware, Inforware, Orgaware, dan Cysnetware). Evaluasi multi-kriteria dilakukan menggunakan metode Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) berbasis linear programming untuk mengakomodasi 3 unsur pengambilan keputusan termasuk hierarki expert di dalam KST. Hasil pengolahan data menunjukkan bahwa komponen Humanware mendominasi sebagai prioritas utama dengan nilai intensitas kontribusi sebesar 0,4054. Komponen Technoware (0,1874), Orgaware (0,1780), dan Inforware (0,1772) berada pada tingkatan tengah dengan nilai kontribusi relatif seimbang, sementara Cysnetware memiliki tingkat prioritas terendah (0,0520). Temuan ini mengonfirmasi teori siklus hidup organisasi di mana pengembangan human capital harus dibangun sebagai fondasi utama sebelum pemenuhan infrastruktur fisik dan digital. Konfigurasi bobot yang dihasilkan dapat menjadi panduan dan acuan prioritas alokasi sumber daya bagi pengelola KST maupun pembuat kebijakan dalam perencanaan pengembangan kawasan menuju fase operasional penuh.
References
[1] Presiden Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2015-2019, 2015.
[2] S. W. Soenarso, D. Nugraha and E. Listyaningrum, "Development of Science and Technology Park (STP) in Indonesia to Support Innovation-Based Regional Economy: Concept and Early Stage Development," World Technopolis Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32-42, 2013.
[3] M. N. Sharif, "Industrial technology innovation management for sustained prosperity: True stories revealing the complexity of replicating South Korean success," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2021.
[4] UNESCAP, "Establishing Science and Technology Parks: A Reference Guidebook for Policymakers in Asia and the Pacific," United Nations Publication, 2019.
[5] N. A. Muhammad, Muhyiddin, A. Faisal and I. A. Anindito, "The Study of Development of Science and Technopark (STP)," The Indonesian Journal of Dev. Planning, pp. 14-31, 2017.
[6] J. d. A. Ribeiro, M. B. Ladeira, A. F. de Faria and M. W. Barbosa, "A reference model for science and technology parks strategic performance management: An emerging economy perspective," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2021.
[7] Presiden Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 106 Tahun 2017 tentang Kawasan Sains dan Teknologi, 2017.
[8] UNIDO, "A New Generation of Science and Technology Parks, UNIDO's Strategic Approach to Fostering Innovation and Technology for Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development," United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2021.
[9] I. Makhdoom, J. Lipman, M. Abolhasan and D. Challen, "Science and Technology Parks: A Futuristic Approach," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 31981-32021, 2022.
[10] M. Anton-Tejon, A. Barge-Gil, C. Martinez and A. Albahari, "Science and technology parks and their heterogeneous effect on firm innovation," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 73, p. 101820, 2024.
[11] T. A. K. BAPPENAS, "Studi Pengembangan Technopark di Indonesia: Survey terhadap 10 Embrio Technopark di Indonesia," Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta, 2015.
[12] Kementerian Riset Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Tinggi, Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2019 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi, 2019.
[13] Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi, "Laporan Kinerja Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Tahun Anggaran 2019," Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi, Jakarta, 2020.
[14] L. Lecluyse, M. Knockaert and A. Spithoven, "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 44, pp. 559-595, 2019.
[15] S. Ningrum and N. Runiawati, "An Overview of the Development of STPs in Indonesia," in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy, and Governance Studies, 2020.
[16] ASTPI, "Rekomendasi Penguatan Lembaga Science Technology Park Berdasarkan Hasil Rapat Anggota ASTPI," Surabaya, 2024.
[17] C. Mondal, M. Al-Kfairy and R. B. Mellor, "Developing Young Science and Technology Parks: Recent Findings from Industrial Nations Using the Data-Driven Approach," Sustainability, vol. 15, p. 6226, 2023.
[18] M. N. Sharif, "Technological innovation governance for winning the future," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 79, pp. 595-604, 2012.
[19] W. K. B. Ng, R. Appel-Meulenbroek, M. Cloodt and M. Arentze, "Exploring science park location choice: A stated choice experiment among Dutch technology-based firms," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 182, p. 121796, 2022.
[20] C. Toth and A. Hary, "A Comprehensive Model for Innovation Ecosystems," Triple Helix, vol. 11, pp. 170-191, 2024.
[21] S. Ullah, A. Sami, T. Ahmad and T. Mehmood, "Why choose technology parks for business location in Pakistan," Innovation and Management Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 365-379, 2023.
[22] E. Cadorin, M. Klofsten and H. Löfsten, "Science Parks, talent attraction and stakeholder involvement: an international study," Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 46, p. 1–28, 2021.
[23] A. Caloffi, A. Colovic, V. Rizzoli and F. Rossi, "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 189, p. 122351, 2023.
[24] U. Ciptomulyono, Pengambilan Keputusan Multi Kriteria: Konsep Dasar Teknik dan Terapannya, Surabaya: ITS Press, 2024.
[25] Y. Ataei, A. Mahmoudi, M. R. Feylizadeh and D.-F. Li, "Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 86, 2020.
[26] D. Pamucar, M. Dobrodolac, V. Simic, D. Lazarevic and O. F. Gorçün, "An interval rough improved ordinal priority approach-based decision support system to redesign postal and logistics networks," Technology in Society, vol. 81, p. 102845, 2025.
[27] A. Mahmoudi, M. Abbasi and X. Deng, "A novel project portfolio selection framework towards organizational resilience: Robust Ordinal Priority Approach," Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 188, p. 116067, 2022.
[28] A. Mahmoudi, "OPA Solver: A Solver for Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis," 7 6 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/106890-opa-solver-a-solver-for-multiple-criteria-decision-analysis.
[29] R. Smith and N. Sharif, "Understanding and acquiring technology assets for global competition," Technovation, vol. 27, pp. 643-649, 2007.
[30] C. Toth, B. Fehervolgyi, Z. C. Kovács and A. Háry, "Contribution of Certain Enablers to Success Criteria of Science and Technology Parks," Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, vol. 33, no. 2, 2025.
[31] M. Klofsten, H. Löfsten and A. Albahari, "A typology approach to understanding the diversity of Science Parks," Technovation, vol. 145, p. 103267, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizal Kurniawan, Udisubakti Ciptomulyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
