Assessment Tingkat Kematangan Budaya Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja
(Studi Kasus: PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Lubuk Pakam)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55826/jtmit.v5i2.1808Keywords:
Budaya Keselamatan, Maturity Level, Skala Likert, Safety CultureAbstract
Budaya keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3) merupakan faktor penting dalam menjaga keandalan operasi dan mencegah kecelakaan kerja pada industri ketenagalistrikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur tingkat kematangan budaya K3 pada PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Lubuk Pakam berdasarkan hasil kuesioner safety culture maturity. Instrumen penelitian terdiri dari 30 item pertanyaan yang dikelompokkan ke dalam delapan dimensi, yaitu commitment, leadership, responsibility, engagement and involvement, risk, competence, information and communication, serta organizational learning. Data dikumpulkan dari 96 responden dan diolah menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif melalui proses coding dan konversi skor skala Likert 1-5. Hasil audit menunjukkan tidak terdapat jawaban kosong dan tidak ada jawaban tidak terpetakan. Total skor seluruh responden adalah 11.423 dengan rata-rata skor maturity sebesar 3,97. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kematangan budaya K3 berada pada level proaktif. Dimensi dengan skor tertinggi adalah organizational learning sebesar 4,27, sedangkan dimensi dengan skor terendah adalah commitment sebesar 3,59. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa budaya K3 telah berjalan baik, namun masih memerlukan penguatan pada dimensi yang memiliki skor relatif lebih rendah.
References
[1] R. Indonesia, “Presiden republik indonesia,” 2009.
[2] A. P. G. Filho, G. Kanegae, and G. Leite, “Safety Culture Maturity and Risk Management Maturity in Industrial Organizations Safety Culture View project Human Factors-Accident investigation View project Safety Culture Maturity and Risk Management Maturity in Industrial Organizations,” no. November 2012, pp. 1–10, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329019799
[3] I. R. Pratama, R. S. Dewi, and A. Sudiarno, “Analysis of factors that affecting safety risk perception in oil refinery industry,” Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., pp. 1660–1665, 2021, doi: 10.46254/sa02.20210633.
[4] S. T. M. Kong, C. Engineering, and H. K. Government, “The organizational culture of safety,” pp. 1–9, 1988.
[5] S. Ramli, “Analysis Implementation Safety Management System Oil and Gas and Safety Culture That Influence on Safety Performance and Worker Motivation To Work Safely,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1189–1199, 2025.
[6] A. N. Heryati, R. Nurahaju, G. Nurcholis, and F. A. Nurcahyo, “Effect of safety climate on safety behavior in employees : The mediation of safety motivation,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 191–200, 2019.
[7] B. E. Hollnagel and D. Slater, “Safety culture maturity : A problem disguised as a solution,” pp. 1–24, 2025.
[8] A. F. Imanudin, “Exploring Safety Culture Maturity Models : A Systematic Review of Approaches , Assessment Elements , and Industrial Contexts,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 736–749, 2025.
[9] A. Maryani, A. Sudiarno, and R. S. Dewi, “Designing Safety Maturity Level Questionnaire of Construction Project,” no. Iconit 2019, pp. 109–114, 2020, doi: 10.5220/0009423001090114.
[10] H. N. B. Jr, D. A. Boone, H. N. Boone, D. A. Boone, and W. Virginia, “Analyzing Likert Data,” vol. 50, no. 2, 2012.
[11] A. N. Ayob, C. R. Che Hassan, and M. D. Hamid, “Safety culture maturity measurement methods: A systematic literature review,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 80, no. May, p. 104910, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104910.
[12] M. D. C. P. D, “Towards a model of safety culture,” vol. 36, pp. 111–136, 2000.
[13] D. Zohar, “Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations : Theoretical and Applied Implications,” vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 1980.
[14] A. Pinto, G. Filho, J. Celio, S. Andrade, M. Mara, and D. O. Marinho, “A safety culture maturity model for petrochemical companies in Brazil,” Saf. Sci., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 615–624, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.012.
[15] G. Zhang, A. J. Fairchild, B. Zhang, D. Shi, and D. Shi, “Comparing Likert and Slider Response Formats in Clinical Assessment : Evidence From Measuring Depression Symptoms Using CES-D 8,” 2026, doi: 10.1177/10731911251329977.
[16] I. Iftadi, B. Suhardi, E. Pujianto, and R. W. Damayanti, “A bibliometric analysis on safety culture maturity model,” vol. 02044, pp. 1–5, 2023.
[17] D. Siuta, B. Kukfisz, A. Kuczyńska, and P. T. Mitkowski, “Methodology for the Determination of a Process Safety Culture Index and Safety Culture Maturity Level in Industries,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 5, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052668.
[18] D. C. Wegner, K. E. Bassey, and I. O. Ezenwa, “Health , Safety , and Environmental ( HSE ) Predictive Analytics for Offshore Operations,” pp. 157–169, 2022.
[19] “SAFETY,” no. August 2017.
[20] A. Sudiarno, “Penilaian Tingkat Kematangan Budaya Keselamatan di Area Produksi Pabrik Baja Penilaian Tingkat Kematangan Budaya Keselamatan di Lingkungan Produksi,” 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/847/1/012076.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hendri Wiyono, Ratna Sari Dewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
