The Impact of Curriculum Changes During Each Regime on The Learning Achievement of Junior High School Students in Indonesia

Authors

  • Rieneke Ryke Kalalo Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon image/svg+xml
  • Moh. Nasir Institut Agama Islam Hasan Jufri Bawean, Indonesia
  • Muhammad STAI Sangatta Kutai Timur, Indonesia
  • Winda Fashiha Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Rachma Putri Kasimbara University of Brawijaya image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55826/jtmit.v4i3.1592

Keywords:

Curriculum Change, Government Regime, Learning Achievements, Junior High School Students, Education Policy

Abstract

The Indonesian education curriculum has undergone dynamic transformations over the course of changing government regimes, from the Old Order era to the Merdeka Curriculum era. This study aims to analyze how changes in curriculum policy in each regime impacted the learning outcomes of junior high school (SMP) students. Using a descriptive qualitative method and a historical literature review, this study examines the shift in curriculum orientation from an ideological to a technocratic-competence orientation. The results of the study indicate that although curriculum changes are intended to respond to the demands of the times and globalization, "policy shock" often occurs at the grassroots level due to the lack of a transition period and adequate teacher training. Inconsistencies in implementation strategies across regimes were found to be a factor hampering the stability of student academic achievement. This study recommends that education policy be independent of short-term political interests to ensure the sustainability of the quality of national education.

References

[1] Alhamuddin. (2019). The politics of curriculum policy in Indonesia: From independence to reform. Prenada Media.

[2] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

[3] Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

[4] Hidayat, S. (2023). Curriculum evaluation in the Indonesian context. Rajawali Pers.

[5] Jalal, F., & Musthafa, B. (2021). Education reform in Indonesia in the context of regional autonomy. Adicita Karya Nusa.

[6] Mulyasa, E. (2017). Curriculum at the educational unit level: A practical guide. Rosdakarya Youth.

[7] Nadiem, AM (2022). Academic study of the independent curriculum. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.

[8] OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

[9] OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Factsheets Indonesia. OECD Publishing.

[10] Prasetyo, T. (2021). History of Indonesian education: From the colonial period to the New Order. Student Library.

[11] Raharjo, B., & Santoso, A. (2022). The psychosocial impact of curriculum changes on secondary school students' learning motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(1), 88-102.

[12] Schleicher, A. (2020). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.

[13] Siahaan, P. (2023). The politics of education: Why is our curriculum always changing? Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

[14] Sufyadi, S., Lambas, L., Rosdiana, T., & Setiyo, A. (2021). Academic study of curriculum for learning recovery. Center for Curriculum and Learning, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

[15] Suratman, T. (2020). National education in the trajectory of history. Graha Ilmu.

[16] Suryosubroto, B. (2020). School curriculum implementation. Rineka Cipta.

[17] Zed, M. (2014). Library research methods. Obor Indonesia Library Foundation.

Downloads

Published

29-09-2025

How to Cite

[1]
“The Impact of Curriculum Changes During Each Regime on The Learning Achievement of Junior High School Students in Indonesia”, JTMIT, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 2230–2234, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.55826/jtmit.v4i3.1592.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2